Monday, May 24, 2010
One of the books that inspired me to write urban fantasy in the first place was a book set in New Orleans just after Hurricane Katrina. It was obvious in the first five pages the author had never set foot in NOLA, and knew nothing of conditions there after the storm. I finished the book, but was angry that the authors had seized upon a setting without bothering to do their homework. I could do better, I thought. I was there. It became the setting and inspiration for my series that comes out next year.
Does it matter? People who don't know New Orleans won't know the difference.
I think it does, that the author has a responsibility to at least make an effort to learn as much as they can about setting. A simple read of the online New Orleans newspaper, the Times-Picayune, could have told the author that the things taking place in his book would not have been physically possible. (Like his character strolling through a neighborhood at a time when, in reality, it was still six feet underwater.)
So, yesterday I took a road trip into rural Chambers County, Alabama, where my work-in-progress is set. It's an imaginary town, Stockholm, based on a real town, Penton. After making the trip, though, I realized the town of LaFayette was a much better model for Stockholm. It also gave me a chance to see what the houses look like around there, how the storefronts look. What type of trees grow along the roadsides leading into and out of town.
If my book had been set in Stockholm, Sweden, of course, I couldn't have taken a quick afternoon jaunt to look around. But there are guidebooks, Internet folks who live there and who might be willing to read passages for accuracy, Google Earth, etc. Lots of easy opportunities for a writer to research place.
What's the setting of your favorite read lately? If it's a real city or area, did the author do a good job of setting the sense of place? Do you think it matters? Let's talk!